Legal Opinion

Rose v. W. B. Worthen Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

This apneal challenges the validity of a mortgage by the guardian or curator of certain minors made to secure a loan with which to pay certain lieiug on their real estate and for their maintenance and support.

Pearl Dooley, the widow of Geo. H. Dooley, now Pearl Dooley Rose, was first appointed administratrix of her husband’s estate and later was discharged or resigned, and appellee company was duly appointed curator or guardian of the minors, who owned certain property, three pieces of real estate of west 12th Street in Little Rock, one piece of which had been mortgaged and upon which there…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rightsell v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Rose v. W. B. Worthen CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Reed v. Futrall, ReceiverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API