Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doty v. American National Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1942Published

1Dissent

SepaRate Opinion op

McCulden, J.',

Concurring as to Resu-£t- in Part- and Dissenting in Part and Requesting OertieiCAtion to Supreme Court. .

McCULLEN, J.

— I find myself able to concur only in the result reached by our worthy Commissioner on the first count of the petition of plaintiff respondent herein, namely, that plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal sum of $300, with interest from the date of the death of the insured. Furthermore, I dissent' from the Commissioner’s holding on the second count that plaintiff is entitled to receive nothing' under said count. I believe that -the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westerman v. Supreme Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. Security Mutual Life Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. Cleaver v. Central States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Henderson v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Wilkins v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API