Legal Opinion

Dakoda Davis v. Farkhanda John, et al.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 3, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00168Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION DAKODA DAVIS PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00168-BSM FARKHANDA JOHN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Defendants’ motion in limine regarding the application of Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-64-120 (Act 28) [Doc. No. 98] is granted and Dakota Davis is precluded from introducing any evidence of, or making reference to, medical expenses “that no one is legally responsible for paying, whether by operation of law or because they were written off, reduced, or adjusted.” Said v. Gogel, Case No. 4CV-23-3364, Benton County…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. Aderhold Ex Rel. Cross County BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Bell v. Stafford Ex Rel. StaffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Bayer CropScience LP v. SchaferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Volunteer Transport, Inc. v. HouseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Westside Loft Apartment v. Tina FowlerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API