Legal Opinion

Beeman v. Georgia Casualty Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1931No. 1287-5759PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

H. J. Hetkes, a paving contractor, was a subscriber under the Workmen’s Compensation Law; the policy of insurance covering his employees was issued by defendant in error.

Plaintiff in error brought this suit against the defendant in error to set aside an order of the Industrial Accident Board by which he was denied compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained while he was driving a team in the course of his employment with Hetkes.

Defendant in error’s defense to the cause of action thus asserted w;as that plaintiff in error was not, at the time he was injured, an employee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Braunschweiger v. WaitsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Mayer v. MutschlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  5. Georgia Casualty Co. v. BeemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Larson v. Independent School District No. 11JIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. State v. Kenyon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. De HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Maddox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API