Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Subaru Telescope National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided November 8, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00064Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII JAMES HOPKINS, Civ. No. 19-00064 JMS-KJM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO vs. DISMISS, ECF NO. 19 SUBARU TELESCOPE NATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY OF JAPAN, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 19 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant “Subaru Telescope National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,” officially known as the “National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,” (“Defendant” or “the NAOJ”), moves to dismiss the Complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff James Hopkins (“Plaintiff” or “Hopkins”). ECF No.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Jackson v. HayakawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea BolivianaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API