Legal Opinion · Dissent

Menendez v. West Gables Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 2013No. 3D11-2587Published

1DissentSchwartz, Senior Judge

I dissent because I disagree with the majority that the applicability of the rescue doctrine was not properly before the lower court or this one; and as a matter of substance, a jury could find that it applies to the facts of this case.

Menendez did not, as the majority holds, forgo reliance on the issue by failing specifically to plead or otherwise invoke it. This is because the rescue doctrine is simply a gloss on or an aspect of questions of legal causation and scope of duty which were raised, as in any negligence case, by the pleadings and arguments below. It provides that a violation of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Krol v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Reeves v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Dunn Bus Service, Inc. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. OliverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API