Legal Opinion

Coe v. Coe

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 2, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On petition for divorce. Decree (on failure to answer) for leave to make proof before special master, and report of master refusing to advise a decree for petitioner, and exceptions thereto by petitioner.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The suit is by a wife against her husband for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony on the ground of desertion.

The parties were married in this state in April, 1900; the defendant was a resident of Morristown and engaged in some sort of labor there; the wife was a native of Morris county and her parents resided there, but she was living in Brooklyn, where she had employment in a millinery establishment.

After her marriage she continued in her employment and to live in Brooklyn until some time in the month of June, 1900, her husband visiting her on Saturdays and Sundays.

*158In June of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stoneburner v. StoneburnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Catinchi v. CatinchiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1919
  3. Brady v. BradyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Catinchi v. CatinchiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API