Legal Opinion

Holbrook Thayer Ashton, II v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1969No. 19213_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Ashton appeals a judgment of conviction for failure to report for and submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of Tit. 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. We affirm.

Defendant urges that there exists “no basis in fact” for his classification and therefore his failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Selective Service Act is immaterial. We disagree. Although failure to appeal one’s classification does not preclude a collateral attack in all cases, 1 the exhaus tion rule cannot be lightly discarded by a simple plea of procedural…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Johnson v. EisentragerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Marc Belding Anderson v. General Lewis B. Hershey, National Director, Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  2. Mottola v. NixonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  3. Velvel v. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. William Orrin SeevertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Arthur Henry RuckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API