Legal Opinion

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 19, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 A. ASMAN, et al., (ECF No. 165) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the court’s order 18 denying reconsideration of its original order that dismissed with prejudice plaintiffs’ 19 constitutional claims against defendants Adam Asman and Erik Bradley.1 (ECF No. 165.) The 20 motion is fully briefed and was taken under submission without oral…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API