Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bank of Marlinton v. McLaughlin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1941No. 9180Published

1ConcurrenceFox, Judge

While I concur in the general result, and in the points of law announced in the syllabus, I wish to be understood as believing that Julia B. McLaughlin is entitled to sub-rogation for amounts paid by her on the Bank of Hills-boro note of $2,400.00, and the debt of the Greenbrier Joint Stock Land Bank, to the extent only that she has made payments from her separate estate. She testified that of the amount so paid, she received approximately $1,200.00 from her father’s estate. This was, of course, her separate estate, and, if applied to her husband’s debts, in the circumstances developed by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank v. AtkinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Horner v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Zinn v. LawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. American Finance Co. v. LeedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. First National Bank of Alderson v. McClungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API