Legal Opinion
Matter of Grand Jury Re Acceturo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 27, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
242 N.J. Super. 281 (1990)
576 A.2d 900
IN THE MATTER OF STATE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION (RE ANTHONY ACCETURO).
ANTHONY ACCETURO, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD ZELINSKI JR., RESPONDENT. (MISTAKENLY CAPTIONED IN THE MATTER OF STATE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION (RE ANTHONY ACCETURO)).
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 31, 1990.
Decided June 27, 1990.
Before Judges KING, SHEBELL and KEEFE.
Harold J. Ruvoldt Jr. argued the cause for appellant Anthony Acceturo in both appeals (Ruvoldt & Ruvoldt, attorneys; Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr. and Richard A. Staggard, on the briefs).
Frank G. Iervolino, Deputy…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AccetturoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992