Legal Opinion

Yardley & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 21, 1951No. C. D. 1371Published

1Opinion of the Court

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The merchandise herein consists of glass perfume bottles, assessed for duty under paragraph 218 (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as bottles produced otherwise than by automatic machine, at 75 per centum ad valorem (in some cases, the assessment was made under the same paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia, T. D. 49458, at 37% per centum ad valorem). They are claimed properly dutiable under the same paragraph at 25 per centum ad valorem as bottles “produced by automatic machine.” Paragraph 218 (e), so far as is pertinent, reads as follows:

Bottles and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. Edgar Allen Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. American Roll Gold Leaf Co. v. W. H. Coe Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API