Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Cliippewa. (Steere, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of trover to recover the value of a pair of horses and certain household furniture which plaintiff claims was the^property of her husband, and was exempt by law from execution. Plaintiff’s husband was the son of the defendant. Her husband left her after they had been married about a week, and went to parts unknown. He was a farmer and a widower when he married plaintiff. The horses and other property had been *153used by him in carrying on the farm. Plaintiff and her husband did not live upon tlie farm after they were married, nor did they keep house, but stopped at his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wildey v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Slater v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In re National Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Cable v. HoolihanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. J. L. Hudson Co. v. No-Name Hat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API