Legal Opinion
Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Brown
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1966No. 10541PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOLIN, Judge.
Defendant appeals from a judgment denying unemployment compensation benefits to Yvonne B. Silman. Case No. 10,542, 188 So.2d 159 was consolidated with the instant case both for trial and on appeal. These cases involve identical factual situations and the ruling in each case was identical, therefore, reference will be made to both in this opinion.
The record reflects Yvonne B. Silman and Mary A. Waggoner, while employed by Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation, both became pregnant. Following their fourth month of pregnancy they were placed on maternity leave in accordance with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Algiers Homestead Association v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of LaborSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of LaborLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of Department of LaborLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Grape v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.