Legal Opinion

United States v. Arkwright Mills

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1943No. 5165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

Arkwright Mills (hereinafter called Arkwright), manufacturers of cotton cloth, paid federal floor stock taxes levied under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq., on a stock of cotton goods which it then had on hand. In United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 312, 80 L.Ed. 477, 102 A.L.R. 914, the United States Supreme Court held that the taxing provisions of this act were unconstitutional and void. Congress, in the Revenue Act of 1936, 7 U.S.C.A. § 644 et seq., provided for the refund of these taxes already paid on condition that the taxpayer,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Honorbilt Products, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. H. T. Poindexter & Sons Merchandise Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. Cudahy Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  2. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Republic Cotton Mills v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API