Legal Opinion

Rubenstein & Son Produce, Inc. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 1, 1954No. 14860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAMER, Justice.

This action was filed by appellee State of Texas against appellant Rubenstein & Son Produce, Inc., and others, through the District Attorney, and against two lots of broken, frozen whole eggs, seeking a temporary and, on final hearing, a permanent injunction against appellant to prohibit it from moving, selling, or otherwise disposing of the eggs; and for the confiscation and destruction of such eggs found to be unfit for human consumption under Title 71, Chapter 3, R.C.S.192S, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 4465a et seq.; asserting that such eggs were below the standard in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fredonia State Bank v. General American Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Hyde v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. State v. 44 Gunny Sacks of GrainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API