Legal Opinion

Union Properties, Inc. v. Gabel

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1965Published

1Opinion of the CourtGerald P. Culicin, J.

Application for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, setting aside the order on protest insofar as it modified the original orders of respondent and reinstating said original orders, is denied. The parties are in general agreement as to the operation of the applicable regulations in respect of hardship rent increases. A landlord must wait until two years after filing of its last hardship application before it may again apply for an increase in maximum rent and though more than *155one increase order may issue within a 24-month period the total permissible increase on any accommodation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heyman v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Miller v. GabelNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API