Legal Opinion

Somerville National Bank v. Hornblower

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The defendants in the first case are stockbrokers doing business under the name of Hornblower and Weeks. Thomas J. McCarthy bought and sold securities through them on margin. He had borrowed money from the plaintiff bank, depositing securities as collateral. On October 24, 1929, during the panic in the stock market, McCarthy directed Hornblower and Weeks to sell two hundred Niagara Hudson Power warrants, which were held by the plaintiff bank as collateral, and they sold them for $1,109.60. McCarthy requested the plaintiff bank by let-, ter to deliver these warrants to Hornblower and Weeks and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Laverty v. . SnethenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Milkman v. OrdwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Carleton & Hovey Co. v. BurnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mechanics National Bank of Worcester v. KilleenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. CatinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. George v. Coolidge Bank and Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. HullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Hanson v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API