Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Paquette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 24, 2006, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

After losing his job as the vice-president of sales in September 2004, claimant filed an application for unemployment insurance benefits. Between December 19, 2004 and March 27, 2005, he received benefits totaling $6,075. However, due to certain activities claimant engaged in with respect to a hosiery company during the benefit period, the Unemployment Insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MurakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of Moreira-BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re the Claim of LapczynskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of LahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. In re the Claim of LahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API