Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coquina Oil Corp. v. Larimer County Board of Equalization

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 13, 1989No. 87SC162Published

1DissentErickson, Justice

I respectfully dissent. Coquina Oil Corporation (Coquina) reported its 1982 production revenue and not its 1981 from four oil leases to the Larimer County Assessor (assessor) pursuant to section 39-7-101, 16B C.R.S. (1982). Based on the report the assessor placed a value on the leases and sent a notice of assessed valuation to Co-quina. Coquina paid the assessed tax and did not discover that an error had been made in the report to the assessor until after the time limitations for protest and adjustment set forth in section 39-5-122, 16B C.R.S. (1982), expired. As a result of a clerical error,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Lamm v. BarberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. Tacorante v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API