Legal Opinion
Kraemer v. Luttrell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 27, 2006No. 05-5431UnpublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Michael Kraemer (“Kraemer”) and Kenneth Roberson (“Roberson”) (referred to collectively as “Appellants”) appeal the dismissal of their claims, pursuant to a motion for summary judgment, against Defendant-Appellee Mark Luttrell (“Luttrell”), Sheriff of Shelby County, Tennessee (“the County”). Kraemer charges that the County violated a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) and committed a constitutional tort by transferring his work assignment in retaliation for filing a grievance regarding uncompensated on-call time. Roberson claims…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Richmond Health Facilities-Kenwood, LP v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Barrella v. Village of FreeportDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Jenkins v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Union Local No. 614District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Carroll v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Ackley v. Howland Township Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.