Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Sebastian Diaz-Salazar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, and the Board of Immigration Appeals
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 1, 1983No. 82-1130, 82-1610Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWeick, Senior Circuit Judge
I concur in No. 82-1130 and respectfully dissent in No. 82-1610 for the reasons hereinafter set forth.
INS concedes that this court has jurisdiction to review the petition for review filed in No. 82-1610. The issue here is whether the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) abused its discretion in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, petitioner’s motion to reopen his deportation hearing in order to *1161apply for suspension of deportation pursuant to Section 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(i). The motion was supported by affidavits to the effect that petitioner…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jorge Santana-Figueroa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Narciso Edgardo Inciong Villena v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Erodina Urbano De Malaluan v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Vuthisit Prapavat and Jongchit Prapavat v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.