Phillips v. Adler
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Appellants contend that the trial court erred in vacating a previous minute entry order granting appellants’ motion for mistrial and that it also erred in directing a verdict on the issue of fraud. We shall set forth only the essential facts and do so in the light most favorable to appellants.
Appellants were in the real estate business in Tucson. Dycon International, Inc. (Dycon) sold special telephone equipment used to solicit real estate listings. This equipment allowed a specially taped message to be played to the recipient of the telephone call. Appellees…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jennings v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Edward Greenband Enterprises of Arizona v. PepperArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Sun Lodge, Inc. v. Ramada Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Hennesy Equipment Sales Co. v. Valley National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Malisewski v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BarriosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Furst v. MayneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022