Vetrick v. Hollander
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Judge.
Appellants seek review of the final judgment1 entered after the hearing on appel-lee’s motion to enforce a continuing writ of garnishment. We reverse.
The parties got divorced in 1978. Ten years later, in an attempt to obtain payment of several orders and a judgment from the divorce proceedings, appellee, the former wife, filed a motion for a continuing writ of garnishment, pursuant to section 77.0305, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988). Appellant, Joseph Vetrick, the former husband, with his response to the motion, filed an affidavit which claimed that he was the head of a family.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. G & G ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Reyf v. ReyfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Martinez v. golisting.comDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017