Legal Opinion

Vetrick v. Hollander

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 29, 1990No. 89-1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Judge.

Appellants seek review of the final judgment1 entered after the hearing on appel-lee’s motion to enforce a continuing writ of garnishment. We reverse.

The parties got divorced in 1978. Ten years later, in an attempt to obtain payment of several orders and a judgment from the divorce proceedings, appellee, the former wife, filed a motion for a continuing writ of garnishment, pursuant to section 77.0305, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988). Appellant, Joseph Vetrick, the former husband, with his response to the motion, filed an affidavit which claimed that he was the head of a family.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. G & G ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Reyf v. ReyfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Martinez v. golisting.comDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API