State v. Eaton

¶1 Mark Eaton was charged by amended information with possession of cocaine. Following his conviction, Eaton asserted that he was convicted of a crime *464with which he was not charged and that his conviction violates his constitutional rights to notice and due process. Based on the record, we agree with the Court of Appeals that Eaton was tried on an amended information charging possession of cocaine. Because he was convicted of possession of cocaine, we reject Eaton’s contention that he was convicted and sentenced for a crime with which he was not charged and affirm the Court of Appeals. State…