Legal Opinion

Christina Saccomano v. Andrew Saul

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 30, 2019No. 3:18-cv-02624Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTINA SACCOMANO, 7 Case No. 18-cv-02624-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDREW SAUL, 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 24 Defendant. 11 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Christina Saccomano brings this action appealing the final decision of Defendant 15 Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”),1 to deny Saccomano’s 16 application for disability benefits. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment 17 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5. For the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API