Tweedy v. Bogart
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action for money had and received, with a garnishment of the Savings Bank of Danbury as having in its hands effects of the defendants; brought to the Superior Court in Fair-field County. The defendants filed a plea to the jurisdiction, which was sustained b}r the court (Andrews, «71), and the complaint dismissed. The plaintiff appealed. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
On September 25th, 1882, the defendants, partners, residing in the state of New York, deposited with the Danbury Savings Bank in this state seventeen bonds of one thousand dollars each, issued by the East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad Company, payable to bearer, and five first mortgage bonds of one thousand dollars each, issued by the Pittsburgh & Western Railroad Company, all payable to bearer; also two certificates for fifty shares each, of the stock of the New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company; all as security for the repayment of the sum of twenty thousand dollars loaned…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Winslow v. FletcherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Grosvenor v. Farmers & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1839
3Cited by5 opinions
- Trotter v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Jordan v. LavinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Moys v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Fritsch v. Buckman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933
- Simpson v. . Jersey City Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900