Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Saratoga Springs Authority
New York Court of Claims
Decided February 27, 1956No. Motion No. 4006PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, P. J.
This is an application for permission, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act, to file a claim against the Saratoga Springs Authority of which entity this court has jurisdiction in tort. (Public Authorities Law, § 1306-a.) Another tribunal has defined the cause pleaded herein as one sounding in tort. (Rosenberg v. Saratoga Springs Auth., 1 A D 2d 832.)
As the motion papers fulfill the specified requirements necessary for the court to grant the leave requested the motion is granted. (Schroeder v. State of New York, 252 App. Div. 16, affd. 276 N. Y. 627.) However,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. . the Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Schroeder v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Schroeder v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Savage v. Mathieson Alkali Works Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Savage v. Mathieson Alkali Works (Inc.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Szmulewicz v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961