Shirley v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted of the crime of robbery and sentenced to three years’ confinement in the state prison. KRS 433.120 (1).
The chief prosecuting witness stated on direct examination that he had not consumed anything intoxicating prior to the time he was robbed. On cross-examination he conceded that, on occasions, he drank a beer or two but never more than four. He was then asked if he had not been arrested about fifteen times for public drunkenness. The court sustained an objection interposed in behalf of the Commonwealth. Appellant contends that this ruling was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tarrence v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Hayden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Whitaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Ellison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Holt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Hodge v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Barth v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Bratcher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Morrow v. StiversCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.