Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Metnick & Levy, P.A. v. Seuling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 2013No. 4D12-3055Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGross, J.

I concur in the affirmance of the dismissal against the Pirrotti law firm. However, I dissent in the reversal of the case against Barbara Seuling because the record fails to disclose that the law firm performed sufficient services in Florida to satisfy the minimum contacts requirement of personal jurisdiction.

The accident for which Seuling retained the law firm had nothing to do with Florida. The collision with a Vermont resident occurred in Vermont. Seuling is a New York resident. Her medical care occurred in New York. A member of the law firm is licensed to practice in New York. The law…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. The Florida Bar v. DancuSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API