Legal Opinion
De Maris v. United States
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 23, 1960No. TH 60-C-74PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STECKLER, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the court upon the application of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus.
Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, but the motion for appointment of counsel is denied. The only right to counsel which a United States citizen has, is, apparently, that which is afforded by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and which is merely restated by Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for the United States District Courts, 18 U.S.C. This right is a right to have counsel in a criminal proceedings only,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Dictograph Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sanders v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Jones v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Jenkins v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vasquez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Konigsberg v. CicconeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
- Kregger v. PosnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Spears v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1967
- York v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.