Legal Opinion

In re Randolph

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2016No. 15-1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order issuing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion issuing the injunction. Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we grant Randolph’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joyner v. Prince William County Circuit CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
  2. Wolfe v. Fairfax CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API