In re Randolph
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order issuing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion issuing the injunction. Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we grant Randolph’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are…
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joyner v. Prince William County Circuit CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
- Wolfe v. Fairfax CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023