Graham Magnetics Incorporated v. Region
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
The suit as resolved at time of the trial before the court, without a jury, presented the question of whether Earl Region, as the vendor in a real estate transaction, was entitled to receive a sum demanded from the vendee, Graham Magnetics Incorporated, as the (remainder of) consideration owed by Graham Magnetics for the property.
The trial court’s judgment awarded Region said approximate $40,000.00 amount by what might be treated as a personal judgment. Graham Magnetics Incorporated brought the appeal.
Affirmed.
Since the respective rights and obligations of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bates v. LefforgeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Harrell v. De NormandieTexas Supreme Court · 1861
- Hammond v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923