Austin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appellant pleaded to the jurisdiction of the County Court, because the case had not been legally transferred from the District to the County Court. No further statement necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
Appellant was tried and convicted of inclosing a large tract of land, being a part of the unappropriated public domain, without having leased the same from the State. The indictment was presented in the District Court on March 13, 1893, and said District Court adjourned on the 18th of the same month. The record of the presentment was duly entered upon the minutes of the court. So far as this record discloses, this was the only order made by the District Court in reference to this case. On the 21st da.y of November, 1893, the clerk of the District Court of Coke County sent to…
2Cited by87 opinions
- Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Herenz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Hyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- State v. CliftonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.