Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. M/V MORGAN

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 26, 2003No. 00 C 46PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

KING, District Judge, Sitting by Designation.

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 17, 1998, a barge being pushed by the tugboat M/V Morgan albded with the East 95th Street Bridge, which crosses over the Calumet River south of Chicago. The allision damaged eight of ten cables used to transmit power to the bridge and its various needs. The Plaintiff City of Chicago (“Plaintiff’ or “City”) brought this suit to recover some $625,000 it spent in repairing or replacing the cables.

The Court conducted a non-jury trial of this action on August 8 and 9, 2002. After the close…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brunet v. United Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. M/v Morgan, Kindra Lake Towing, L.P., and Kindra Lake Towing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Great Lakes Business Trust v. M/T Orange SunDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation v. Ingram Barge CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
  4. M/V Morgan v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. State of Alaska, DFCS, Office of Children's Services v. Brett LaneAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API