Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Gimbel Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on thg lg,w and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the third-party action is reinstated, and a new trial ordered, with costa tp abide the event. While we are of the opinion that there was substantial compliance with the requirements of the code, that fact alone is not determinative nor necessarily exclusive on the issue of liability because of the nature of the preparation. Whether there was a breach of warranty in light of the express purpose and knowledge pf the use to which the preparation would be put is another question to be passed upon on a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Emil H. Moschkau v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  3. Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API