Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Frazier Bros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1889No. Nos. 95, 96, 97PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OE COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OE ALLEGHENY COUNTY. Nos. 95, 96, 97 October Term 1888, Sup. Ct.; court below, Nos. 69, 70, 71 September Term 1887, C. P. No. 1. To tlie first Monday of July, 1887, three several writs of scire facias sur mechanics’ liens were issued in actions by John Frazier, et al., partners as Frazier Brothers, in one of which Joseph N. Patterson, was defendant, in another, C. F. Haseltine and E. H. Haseltine, his wife, in right of said wife, and…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE COURT OE COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OE ALLEGHENY COUNTY. Nos. 95, 96, 97 October Term 1888, Sup. Ct.; court below, Nos. 69, 70, 71 September Term 1887, C. P. No. 1. To tlie first Monday of July, 1887, three several writs of scire facias sur mechanics’ liens were issued in actions by John Frazier, et al., partners as Frazier Brothers, in one of which Joseph N. Patterson, was defendant, in another, C. F. Haseltine and E. H. Haseltine, his wife, in right of said wife, and in the third, Thomas H. Patterson. Issue in each action. The causes were tried together on March 12,1888, when the…

1Opinion of the Court

OpinioN,

Mr. Justice Paxson :

These cases all depend upon the same principle. They were mechanics’ claims filed against a block of buildings in Pittsburgh, known as the Patterson Block. The claims filed were for the “ erection and construction,” while the evidence is uncontradicted that the work was done and the materials were furnished for alterations and repairs. The learned judge submitted to the jury the question whether the alterations were such as to render it practically a new building, and they found in favor of the plaintiffs.

A lien will not lie for alterations and repairs under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Norris's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. Armstrong v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  4. In re HowettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  5. Driesbach v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. WeightmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Hanson Associates, P.C. v. Gallery Plaza PartnershipRichmond County Circuit Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API