Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Allegheny Def. Project v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 2, 2019No. 17-1098; C/w 17-1128, 17-1263, 18-1030Published

1ConcurrenceMillett, Circuit Judge

As for the Homeowners' due-process claim, I recognize that circuit precedent ties my hands. But the Commission has twisted our precedent into a Kafkaesque regime. Under it, the Commission can keep homeowners in seemingly endless administrative limbo while energy companies plow ahead seizing land and constructing the very pipeline that the procedurally handcuffed homeowners seek to stop. The Commission does so by casting aside the time limit on rehearing that Congress ordered-treating its decision as final-enough for the pipeline companies to go forward with their construction plans, but not…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API