Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Baton Rouge
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1970No. 7985PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
233 So.2d 569 (1970)
Howard T. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 7985.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
March 24, 1970.
Robert M. Day, Baton Rouge, for appellant.
Bobby L. Forrest, Charles H. Dameron, Joseph F. Keogh, Baton Rouge, for appellees.
Before LANDRY, SARTAIN and ELLIS, JJ.
SARTAIN, Judge.
This is the second case contesting the constitutionality of Ordinances Nos. 2317 and 3095 pertaining to rezoning adopted by the Councils of the City of Baton Rouge and the Parish of East Baton Rouge respectively. See our opinion of this date in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meyers v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Perot v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Villa Del Rey Citizens Ass'n v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
3Cited by10 opinions
- Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Villa Del Rey Citizens Ass'n v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- DeCuir v. Town of MarksvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Jenniskens v. Parish of JeffersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.