Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brent Brown Dealerships v. Tax Commission, Motor Vehicle Enforcement Division

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 22, 2006No. 20050333-CAPublished

1ConcurrenceThorne, Judge

¶ 34 I concur in both the result reached by the majority opinion and its analysis, except for its interpretation of the word “offense” as used in Utah Code section 41-3-702(2). See Utah Code Ann. § 41-3-702(2) (2005). I do not believe that Brent Brown’s arguments in this case necessitate a formal and final interpretation of that term, or the underlying prohibition on licensed dealers assisting unlicensed salespersons in unlawful activity, see id. § 41-3-210(6) (2005). Accordingly, I would decline to interpret either statute at this time and instead reserve the issue until a question of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Esquivel v. Labor Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Derbidge v. Mutual Protective Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. Beiwei Li v. Shuyu ZhangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API