Brett v. Ming
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from Jackson County. The facts are contained in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Douglas, C. J.:
This is an action of assumpsit, originally instituted by Frederick X,. Ming, in the Superior Court of Jackson county, to recover the *442amount of a certain promissory note, given by the appellant to the said Frederick L. Ming, which note is as follows.:
$615. On demand, the first day of January next, I promise to pay Frederick L. Ming, Agerti, &c., six hundred and fifteen dollars, value received. Oct. IQlh,. 1839.
(SreifED,) JOHN BRETT, Jr.
Such proceedings were had in said suit, that, on the 18th day of October, A. D., 1843, judgment was rendered against the defendant for the sum of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haxton v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Thompson v. KetchamNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Field v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- President, Directors, & Co. of the Mechanics' Bank v. MinthorneNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Bacon v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank v. Security National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Powell v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- S(c)holtz v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Powell v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1957