United States v. Hernandez-Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals were brought by defendants seeking to reduce their sentences for drug-related crimes. They invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to reduce in certain circumstances a previously imposed sentence, and contend that the Supreme Court's recent interpretation of § 3582(c)(2) in Hughes v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 138 S. Ct. 1765, 201 L.Ed.2d 72 (2018), requires that their motions for resentencing be granted, Ninth Circuit precedent to the contrary notwithstanding. See United States v. Padilla-Diaz , 862 F.3d 856 (9th Cir. 2017).
*1130We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Guy SpruhanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- (PS) Moore v. YoussefiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Maxwell v. PacioneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Perez-Verdugo v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- United States v. KheyreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026