Legal Opinion

FMC Corp. (Peroxygen Chemicals Division) v. Unmack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petitions dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced these consolidated proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law challenging as excessive respondents’ assessments of its property for the 1992 through 1994 tax years. The subject property is an industrial complex consisting of 15 buildings on a 12-acre site adjacent to the Niagara River in the Town of Tonawanda. From the time the complex was constructed in the mid-1920s, it has been used as a chemical manufacturing plant. At trial petitioner presented a market…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Allied Corp. v. Town of CamillusNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. KiernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Merrick Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. General Electric Co. v. Town of SalinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FMC Corp. v. UnmackNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Grandview Heights Ass'n v. Board of Assessors of GreeceNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API