Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eladio Gomez-Velazco v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2018No. 14-71747, 14-73303Published

1DissentNavarro, Chief District Judge

I would grant the Petition for Review and vacate the Final Administrative Removal Order (“FARO”) issued on June 12, 2014.

I would first make the distinct finding— as opposed to the majority’s assumption— that Gomez-Velazco’s right to counsel was violated. “Although there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel in an immigration hearing, Congress has recognized it among the rights stemming from the Fifth Amendment guarantee of due process that adhere to individuals that are the subject of removal proceedings.” Tawadrus v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1099, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004) (citing Rios-Berrios v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Mooneer Riad Tawadrus v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Nestor Rodrigo Rios-Berrios v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Anthony Alexander Campbell v. Bert RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Jona Kipkorir Biwot v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API