Indussa Corporation v. SS Ranborg
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Claimants, as alleged owners of S. S. “RANBORG”, (hereinafter referred to as “RANBORG”) move herein for an order declining jurisdiction of this suit for cargo damage. The facts out of which this litigation arises are as follows:
Libelant, a New York corporation, was the consignee of a shipment of nails and barbed wire which was delivered to RAN-BORG in Antwerp, Belgium, for delivery to San Francisco, California. Each bill of lading states that the goods were in “apparent good order and condition.” Libelant alleges that upon receipt in San Francisco, the cargo…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leasewell, Ltd. v. Jake Shelton Ford, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1976
- Ivor B. Clark Co. v. HoganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969