Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 14, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2010-0483Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CHAIM KAPLAN et al, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) Case No. 10-cv-483 (RCL) ) CENTRAL BANK OF THE ) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al., ) Defendants. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs now ask the Court to sever their Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) claims against defendant Bank Saderat PLC (BSPLC) and to transfer those claims to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Pls.’ Mot. to Transfer Venue, ECF No. 72. BSPLC does not oppose this motion, subject to the reservations that it “reserve[es] all its rights, contest[s]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SALNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Kaplan v. Cent. Bank of the Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Kaplan v. HezbollahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Wultz v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API