Legal Opinion

King v. Ohio Valley Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1923No. 3771PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether, at the date of the alleged act of bankruptcy, King was so engaged “chiefly in farming or tilling of the soil” as to' forbid the adjudication in bankruptcy from which he appeals. The act of bank*929ruptcy was the making of a deed of general assignment on March 29, 1922. At that time he was the owner of several farms, or tracts of farmiñg land, including about 700 acres in two different counties, representing investments therein by him of not less than $60,000. He also owned a gristmill in a small village, which mill had cost…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. W. H. Kenworthy & SonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  2. Gregg v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Counts v. Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
  4. Robertson v. DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Blanton Smith Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
  2. In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API