Legal Opinion

Wood v. Santa Monica Escrow Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 2009No. B205939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

A party who prevails on appeal is not necessarily the prevailing party in an action.

Defendant prevailed in the underlying lawsuit when plaintiff dismissed with prejudice. Defendant moved for attorney fees pursuant to a fee provision in the contract between the parties. The trial court denied the motion and defendant appealed. We affirmed.

Plaintiff now seeks attorney fees because he prevailed on defendant’s appeal of the denial of its motion for fees. We agree with the trial court that plaintiff is not entitled to fees. Defendant is the prevailing party in the lawsuit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Presley of Southern California v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Mustachio v. Great Western BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Wood v. Santa Monica Escrow Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. PSM Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  3. La Carriere v. Greene, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Barez v. Ni CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. De la Carriere v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API