Wood v. Santa Monica Escrow Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
A party who prevails on appeal is not necessarily the prevailing party in an action.
Defendant prevailed in the underlying lawsuit when plaintiff dismissed with prejudice. Defendant moved for attorney fees pursuant to a fee provision in the contract between the parties. The trial court denied the motion and defendant appealed. We affirmed.
Plaintiff now seeks attorney fees because he prevailed on defendant’s appeal of the denial of its motion for fees. We agree with the trial court that plaintiff is not entitled to fees. Defendant is the prevailing party in the lawsuit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Presley of Southern California v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Mustachio v. Great Western BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Wood v. Santa Monica Escrow Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- PSM Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- La Carriere v. Greene, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Barez v. Ni CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
- De la Carriere v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019