Zabel v. New State Telephone Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Monroe; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by John O. Zabel and Thornton Dixon, co-partners as Zabel & Dixon, against the New State Telephone Company, for commissions on the sale of stock, and the breach of an agreement to furnish telephone service. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
This is an action for breach of contract. The contract was in writing, and provided that the plaintiffs should assist the defendant and its agents in the sale of stock, and for such services receive in stock 10 per cent., and in coupons 1 per cent., of all stock sales made, with the assistance of plaintiffs, in Dundee and surrounding towns, and also 5 per cent, in cash on the amount realized from the organization of local exchanges. In addition, the company agreed to grant plaintiffs free telephone service between Dundee and Petersburg, “if said lines are built from results of assistance…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Horbach v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Lex v. Selway Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- National Leather Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Valade v. MassonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Ziliox v. City View Apartment & Storage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.