Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Smart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 2012Published

1Dissent

Scudder, P.J., and Martoche, J.

(dissenting in part). We respectfully dissent in part and would affirm the judgment of conviction without reducing defendant’s sentence. In our view, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe and thus, under the circumstances of this case, we see no reason to reduce the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice.

Defendant was charged with burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and, following a jury trial, was convicted of that charge. The conviction arose out of an incident in which defendant, with two others, entered a home…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Holtzman v. HellenbrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. People v. QuinonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. Khuong Dinh PhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API